Experiments with Swiss children have explored the development of sharing behaviour
and its origins in nature or nurture, concluding that it owes something to both
causes.
It is every parent's observation that children begin to show 'social' sharing
behaviour only when they reach the age of seven or eight, however hard you try
to program them earlier.
Professor Ernst Fehr of the University of Zurich showed children of different
ages a photo of another child and asked them to distribute portions of jelly
beans and other small sweets.
Nearly 80% of the older children preferred to divide the available sweets evenly
rather than unequally, and 40% of them - in a variation of the game - chose
to give some sweets to the other child even when they could have kept all of
them. In a variation the researchers labelled 'envy', however, the children
usually preferred to go without extra sweets if it meant giving still more to
the other child.
Only 9% of younger children were prepared to treat the other child fairly.
"I think that both genes and culture play a role," said Professor
Fehr. "Nobody would dispute that the sexual maturation of children is driven
by biology and genes, so why should other phenotypes, like those associated
with fairness behaviour, not also be driven by biology and genes?" He thinks
however that the results suggest that; "social norms of equality can come
into being even without extended forms of cultural transmission."
In 2006 Professor Fehr reported research which located control of fairness
behaviour in a part of the frontal lobes known as the dorsolateral prefrontal
cortex, or DLPFC. Previous researchers had suggested that the DLPFC suppresses
our judgement of fairness, but Fehr's research showed the opposite: that the
region suppresses our natural tendency to act in our own self interest.
He used transcranial magnetic stimulation to temporarily shut off activity
in the DLPFC, with the result that, in circumstances when people would normally
reject a low cash offer in a transaction game, subjects were actually more likely
to take the money.
"The DLPFC is really causal in this decision. Its activity is crucial
for overriding self interest," said Fehr. When the region is not working,
people still know the offer is unfair, he says, but they do not act to punish
the unfairness.
The DLPFC is far better developed in humans than in any other species, although
it does not reach its full capability until the early twenties. Again, every
parent knows that this is the age at which those Masters of the Universe we
call teenagers start to show some small signs of social maturity.
It is hard to resist the conclusion that the expansion of the DLPFC (and many
other brain adaptations) was part of the evolutionary process that made it possible
for humans to live in socially complex groups. But the cultural programming
processes we call parenting and education are also important.